![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
have not found another very close.
Im not sure Im going to use the baitwell in the transom, if I do ti will be a secondary well. Im figuring my weights right now. For fishing the rear well is nice, for CG issues it might be tough to make it work without moving fuel/console up too. Good luck finding another one.
__________________
http://www.boatbuildercentral.com/ ![]() my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=22090 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd move the tank forward and go with a single 150 gallon tank. The batteries were originally installed in the bilge area behind the tank. They should be moved under the console which will help. In my opinion on a CC the more weight moved forward the better as my 1977 runs "bow proud". I can get some measurements but you can get most from the brochures list on this site. Good luck.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not sure what your plans are for using this boat, but when I redid mine, I put in a 150 gal tank, and with a single suzuki 4 stroke, I probably only needed 100 gallon. When you try to plane it out with 1/2 tank of gas, the gas all sloshes to the back, and you have to work it a bit.
I have never been able to burn more than 50 gals in a day. It is probably the only thing if I had to do over I would change. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975. http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I went with a 120 Gal. Tank and thats been working out pretty good for me.
FellowShip . Just for the Grins ![]() Official 23 SF Antique Classic SeaCraft Owner |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you may not need to core the hull insides, I did my 20 without any and my current Conch 27 does not have any either. You will be very surprised how stiff the hull sides become once you tab the deck to it. On my 20 I laid in some fairing compound and then gelcoated it, on the Conch I think they hit the woven roven with a D/A and 60 grit then rolled the gel on, not pretty, but it could be if you spent some time with fairing.
Nice score by the way that boat looks like a perfect blank canvas!! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hindsight, twin 60 gal would be great, but it is what it is now. When I get a 40 gal livewell in the transom full of water, 100 pounds of ice in the fish box in the floor, the 250 suzuki hanging 3 feet off the back, and a couple fishing buddies decide to sit on the transom, it can take a minute or so to get on plane. The trim tabs pretty much fix the problem.
Weight is an issue with these boats, and my goal has been to remove every pound I don't need. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks guys. The coring of the sides, Im still up in the air about, I may just go with stiffeners and "box frames"
John B, that is helpful. How far is you sole above the waterline? How well does the cockpit drain? I am trying to lighten it up a bit. Dual tanks is something I have been considering, its a pretty easy thing to do, and will allow me to adjust trim. I really do not like the idea of the bait tank sitting on the transom. I like it for fishing, but you have 2 guys standing back there rigging/fishing, 100 gallons of water, then a heavy outboard 30" further back then originally designed.
__________________
http://www.boatbuildercentral.com/ ![]() my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=22090 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The sole is mounted at the factury height.
Unless you get 2 guys standing in the corner at rest, the scuppers stay dry. I also have the rabud covers on them, so water doesn't come in. Cockpit drains fine. I mounted my bracket as low as I could get it to get max floatation at rest. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice project
![]() ![]() and my boat ![]() ![]()
__________________
__________________________________________________ ________________ 1974 23SF |
![]() |
|
|