Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2011, 06:29 AM
tomfl tomfl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Default Some help please on older seacraft models

Need some help on older "potter" era hulls.

Are all the 20' hulls really 19' and change in length or did they make one slightly over 20'? Sometimes I see them listed as a 20.5' hull and am confused by this.

Also, how does the seavette hull compare to the 20' CC hull and what are the specs? LOA, deadrise, draft, weight, etc??

I'm looking to start a resto based on an older model and would like something slightly over 20' in length. It would wind up as a CC if I chose either model.

The later model 21 is more like a true offshore CC than what I'm looking to do as it's heavier, too much freeboard, draft, etc.

Thanks for the help
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-23-2011, 09:29 AM
ScottM ScottM is offline
Dieter Sprockets
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 2,221
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

The Moesley and Potter 20's are 19' and change whereas the post-Potter 20's were stretched to 20' 4" or so. The current 21' is actually 20' 5" and is more or less a 23' with a foot and a half chopped off the back. It's a more substantial boat than the 20'. The Seavette uses the 23' hull shared with the CC, Sceptre and Savage models. Perhaps you are referring to the Seafari which uses the same hull as the 20' CC.

Confused yet?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2011, 10:00 AM
BigLew BigLew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newburyport Area; Massachusetts
Posts: 1,364
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

Quote:
Confused yet?
I don't know about the original question asker, but I AM!

Just kidding. (You can't tell your players without a score card!)
__________________
Getting home is more important than getting there!

Plan accordingly!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-23-2011, 11:21 AM
tomfl tomfl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

Heck I was confused long before I posted! But the good news is that things are clearer now!!

What I definately DON'T want is the 21 footer that is basically a 23' with a foot and a half shaved off. I've had two 23' footers in the past and loved them, but for my intent with this boat I'll need to be very close to the 20' model in design as it will be an inshore and coastal boat for the most part.

So, if I really like the spec's on the 20' seacraft hull, but want something similar in design, weight, draft, gunnel height, deadrise, etc., BUT with another ~foot of LOA, I should be looking at the post-Potter era hulls? What years specifically should I be looking for? And are these well-constructed hulls?

Thanks for the help guys

-T
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2011, 02:55 PM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

Tom, the Potter/Moesly hulls for the post-1968 20' are actually 19'8". The Moesly 1966-69 19' hulls are 19'6". Later hulls are 20'4". Moesly/Potter hulls are generally a bit heavier, with 4 layers of hand-laid woven roving fiberglass.

As a SeaCraft dealer in '87, we were told that in order to lighten the hull by 200lbs, Tracker had decided to go with an outer layer of 8 oz. cloth, 2 layers of 6 oz. mat (aka "chop"), and 1 hand-laid layer of woven roving. I don't know first-hand if that's what they actually did, just the briefing for changes coming for the 1988 model year. I don't see why that wouldn't still be as strong as you'd ever need a hull to be, it's just different.

I remember as well both the Potter 20'SF and the Tracker 20' had exactly the same fore and aft CG [measured from the stern], despite the length difference and the fact that most of the Trackers had a 25" transom. (20" was optional)
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2011, 05:02 PM
tomfl tomfl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

Frank, that was a huge help, thank you for posting.

So if I'm looking specifically for one of those 20' 4" hulls, would it be safe to say I should be looking for model years of post '69 until '87 for the "original" fiberglass layup, and post '87 for the revised fiberglass layup?

-T
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2011, 05:51 PM
1970 1970 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Boynton Beach FL
Posts: 18
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

No, the 20'4" started in the early 80's, maybe 82? It will be the hull with the raised boxes in aft corners
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-24-2011, 12:13 AM
Mikem8560 Mikem8560 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Charlotte Harbor Florida
Posts: 577
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

Mt 82 is 20'4"
__________________

82 seacraft 20SF

Bayview Canvas
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-24-2011, 12:27 AM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

Quote:
Frank, that was a huge help, thank you for posting.

So if I'm looking specifically for one of those 20' 4" hulls, would it be safe to say I should be looking for model years of post '69 until '87 for the "original" fiberglass layup, and post '87 for the revised fiberglass layup?

-T
No, because the 20' was still 19'8" until 1980 or '81. You're looking for an '81 to '86 if you just gotta have the 20'4" hull and the 4 layers of woven roving.

I suggest forgetting about the 8" difference, and just find a good SC hull from '69 to '86, and truthfully, I have never heard of a post-'86 Tracker SeaCraft 20' hull failure either.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:15 PM
tomfl tomfl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Default Re: Some help please on older seacraft models

Thanks guys, that's the info I was looking for.

Will post once I get a hull and start tinkering..

-T
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft