Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2013, 06:49 AM
CHANCE1234 CHANCE1234 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 903
Default

90-115 hp. 2 stroke and keep the engine as close to 300 lbs max as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2013, 09:24 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Amen to what Chance said. Reason is these hulls are extremely efficient, don't need a lot of power, and will plane at about 12 mph with a 300 lb motor! Moesly designed the 19/20' hull in the mid-60's for the lightweight motors available at the time, which didn't exceed more than about 110 hp and 300 lbs. If you hang a 500 lb 4-stroke on it, you will screw up the balance of the boat, raise it's min planing speed to the low 20's, and end up with a worse ride and handling than if you stay with the original configuration. Adding a bracket will make the situation even worse and require many other changes to get an acceptable ride and low speed planing performance.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2013, 10:10 PM
boatervalpo boatervalpo is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 7
Default

Would a 125hp at 400lbs cause much issue / change of ride?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushwacker View Post
Amen to what Chance said. Reason is these hulls are extremely efficient, don't need a lot of power, and will plane at about 12 mph with a 300 lb motor! Moesly designed the 19/20' hull in the mid-60's for the lightweight motors available at the time, which didn't exceed more than about 110 hp and 300 lbs. If you hang a 500 lb 4-stroke on it, you will screw up the balance of the boat, raise it's min planing speed to the low 20's, and end up with a worse ride and handling than if you stay with the original configuration. Adding a bracket will make the situation even worse and require many other changes to get an acceptable ride and low speed planing performance.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2013, 10:38 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Lighter is definitely better, and 400 lbs seems to be about the upper limit; a lot of guys are running the older V-6 Mercs that weigh about that. If I was making a 10 hr run to the Abaco's, I'd prefer the old 300 lb V-4 I used to have! The carb'd 60 degree 150/175 V-6 OMC's weigh about 375 and provide plenty of power. The 115/130 V-4 E-TEC's also weigh about 375. You can offset some of the weight effect by moving batteries and the console forward and by running a 4B stern lifting prop and a Doelfin or equivalent on the motor, but that will reduce WOT speed.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft