Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2013, 10:43 AM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr. Frank View Post
The only ride comparable to a SeaCraft I have ever found/experienced is a newer (2003+) Sailfish 21, 23, or 26, all of which use the Moesly VDH hull design.

Contender? great boat, still lands hard in short wave period swells.
Regulator? smooth ride up to 3', then starts to bow jack in any steep swell.
Intrepid? See Contender above.
Scout? Stable, but pounds in any kind of a cross sea.
80's era Mako 238 or 258? Lands hard in a choppy swell mix, always.

And as for the New Mako 234? Got a ride in November in the Keys. It was great in a moderate chop, and choppy swells averaging 2-3, but when the swell got above 3' offshore, the flats on the hard chines slammed the hull pretty hard at any approach angle, and the whole boat shuddered. Near Sombrero Light, we actually had to come off plane in 3-5' seas with a 4 sec. wave period, even with trim tabs.
What are your thoughts on Reggie Fountain hulls? I spent allot of time offshore in a 31 and to this day feel it was one of the most amazing head and quartering sea hulls I had ever been on.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2013, 07:43 PM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default

I have a parishioner who owns a '96 Fountain 31' with twin Merc 225's. Because even with K-planes his boat's planing angle changes drastically below 22 mph, the ride in this boat in 3'-5' seas does not measure up to the SeaCraft. In fact, his next-door neighbor has a Sailfish 26' with twin 200 Etecs that he agrees gives a smoother ride in seas above 3' at 20-25 mph.

But in 2'-3', the 31' Fountain can cruise along at 35-40 mph with only the occasional hard landing, which feat I would not try in a 23' SeaCraft, but would have no fear to do in a 25' Seafari, or 27' Seacraft.

I have yet to ride in a newer 32' SeaCraft, so I can't speak to these boats.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2013, 08:20 PM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 404
Default

Test drove a hydrasport once around 23' that just would not pound. It tended to list in the wind, but tabs would have fixed that.

Rode better through 2- 4' chop than any small boat I've been in since.
Better than the Mako I owned, better than the 25' Mako I rented, better than my Wellcraft V21'.

I haven't been in a Seacraft 23' but friend who has one told it's a good ride, but can also pound in certain angles.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft