![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just finished a 76 "potter" now starting my 86 "tracker" SC 20. From what I'm seeing, the trackers were made much better than the potters! Thicker glass, cleaner fit and finish, way more floatation, ZERO FLEX in hullsides where as my 76 had a TON of flex to it, better consoles, better more spacious rigging tubes, and way better job of sealing in wood on hatch lids..... So why the bad rap on trackers? Anyone??
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
4
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bye bye 18....
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
At the end of the day, i think we all celebrate the terrific designs and efforts that Carl Moesly and Bill Potter that worked hard to bring these terrific boats to those of us that appreciate them. Tracker? - well, they built some decent boats too. I love my '89 23 CC almost as much as the '70 20 CC and '67 19 Bowrider. Just glad to be in the game.
__________________
Otto And yes, I still believe in the four boat theory... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I totally agree.....Since the Potter came first I can see the love being for them. But my viewpoint on it is every year materials, resins, glass, etc, get better and lighter, and we learn what we thought was once good is now inferior. The hull design of the potters were way ahead of their time, but I honestly think tracker did some good things with the boats. Either way, both are good boats and are derived from the same design anyway. I bet the negative feedback is from someone who knows someone who knew someone....Not from real owners. Regardless I am excited to get this baby back on the water!! Thanks for your input
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When you gonna let me get my hands on your master angler?!!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's the shape way more than the vintage. (hull AND care!)
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yea I guess it all goes back to how well a boat was cared for regardless of age.
|
![]() |
|
|