Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2015, 10:48 PM
martin martin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: panama City Fl.
Posts: 1,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnafuFishTeam View Post
Let me explain. First off the motor could have been losing carboration in one of the cylinders or a number of other mechanic issues. I will agree that the prop is the key to the equation. If someone were to ever tell their mechanic there boat was not planing at 3700 rpms, I hope that would be the first recommendation. But we're getting away from the topic.

No question you get more out of the hole with a two stroke vs a four stroke. I have a 2006 HPDI. Given my personal experience, you will get a boat that performs well (when proped correctly), no planning issues, is extremely fuel efficient and will get the job done.

Now if you want to enclose the transom and add a bracket, a 200 would be light.
And that is what is probably going to happen.enclosed transom and dual engine bracket.. Come to think about putting a single ,On a dual bracket , I believe you need a 30" shaft motor.. Yes, no??? My theory is it's.better to have more engine than not enough... But that just me... I like 2 strokes..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft