That was my point back on post #3. As mentioned above the 3.3 225 Yamahas were really wimpy engines (Moose is right on his numbers), however the Yamaha marketing machine sold a bunch of them. They are doing the same with the I-4 200. Again I do not have personal experience, I'm going by other folks opinions. The Maverick forum had this same discussion a couple of years ago on this engine and that's where I got most of my info. What you don't want to do is compare the Yami I-4 200 to the eTec 200HO, it would be embarrassing to the Yamaha with the difference in actual power/torque. Crazy difference.
I had a F150 on my 22' Pathfinder I just sold so don't think I'm anti Yamaha.
|
10-28-2015, 06:20 PM
Threaded Mode