Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2016, 07:17 AM
TomParis TomParis is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 450
Default

I cannot answer the question, be patient there are people on the board who can, but I can provide a website that might be helpful.

http://www.moeslyseacraft.com/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-25-2016, 09:09 AM
wattaway2 wattaway2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft.Lauderdale,Fl.
Posts: 611
Default

haven't owned one but from previous post I remember they used a different stringer layout (4) insted of the type Potter used . many think theearlier grid system was at least as good or better . If I remember the fuel tank is in the cc rather than under the floor --I like the tank under the floor myself but??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2016, 10:40 AM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

I believe the change Potter made from Moesly's original 4 stringer design to the 2 box stringers was primarily a cost reduction because it would require less glass and resin, and the change occurred in '73-74 after the first Arab oil embargo when the price of oil, gas and resin went up by 2-3X!. There is no way it can be as stiff as the 4-stringer design, but the fact that it works simply indicates how overbuilt the original Moesly design is! Moesly started out by building the old 21 as light as he thought possible and then raced it to intentionally beat the hell out of it to find any weak spots. Not only did his boats finish races in weather so severe that it destroyed the boats of many competitors, the 21 dominated the outboard classes, so I don't think there were any weak spots! Moesly knew from his racing experience what worked and what didn't. Potter had no boat building experience before he bought the company from Moesly, so whatever he knew he learned from Moesly during a couple of years of working with him before taking over the company. Although I've never heard of a structural problem on a Moesly boat, there have been some rare quality control problems documented on here on a couple of Potter boats - a loose stringer on a 23 and some hull cracks on a 25 Seafari in an area that wasn't built with the ballast tank the way Moesly had designed it.

I believe the scuppers on the Moesly 20's run out the transom instead of down through the bottom, and he may have crossed the drain lines under the deck so port scupper drains out stbd side, etc.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2016, 04:42 PM
Terry England Terry England is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, Florida
Posts: 895
Default Moesly SeaCrafts

I located the 4 stringers in my 67 Moesly Bowrider and cut 8 or 10 trapezoid inspection holes in the floor to see what had broken loose in the last 30 years. To my astonishment everything was still stuck together perfectly including the plywood subfloor except for one 12" X 12" spot. I poured some foam in the outer stringer spaces, glued the floor inspection ports back down, and laid a couple of thin matts down on the floor before gelcoating the no-skid in place. That was back in '99. It's still as solid as a bowling alley.
Press on Brother, you're better off with a 69 Moesly that a 2008 Proline, Bayliner, Wellcraft, Aquasport,_________fill in the blanks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2016, 04:48 PM
sktenor sktenor is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11
Default Wow, you guys rock!!

Thank you all for the insight! I will go forward with confidence now.
This is one amazing forum!
Sktenor
17 mako 1983
21 Seacraft cc 1983
23 2001 contender
24 2007 regulator
2010 divorce no more boats!
2016 back on the block i hope...lol
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2016, 06:11 PM
Terry England Terry England is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, Florida
Posts: 895
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sktenor View Post
Thank you all for the insight! I will go forward with confidence now.
This is one amazing forum!
Sktenor
There are varying opinions about our amazingness! It seems to have a lot to do with introductions and first impressions. Fr. Frank's presence keeps us from using construction site adjectives on some who've earned them!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-25-2016, 07:44 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sktenor View Post
Thank you all for the insight! I will go forward with confidence now.
This is one amazing forum!
Sktenor
17 mako 1983
21 Seacraft cc 1983
23 2001 contender
24 2007 regulator
2010 divorce no more boats!
2016 back on the block i hope...lol
Confidence can be a double edged sword.

If you are anything like me, check your confidence at the door.
I was the Yankee barney surfboard ding fixer in my youth.

Ask questions before you get closed out surfing the day after `Cane David while the Ron Jons sat watching.

Since you have not yet received your decoder ring, I will explain and
I never do this.

Imagineer to your hearts content, but ask every silly question you can about
layup, glass types, and anything you plan to do before you make the same mistakes
of those of us who have walked before you, and yes, this place rocks.

Many of us have become friends here.
Welcome,
GFS

PS it is spelled Moesly and please visit moeslyseacraft.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2016, 01:24 AM
sktenor sktenor is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11
Default Looking forward to the education ahead!

Thanks for the correction in spelling. Not sure how that one slipped by me as I have lived on that site all week. Having a seacraft 21 years ago (with little research) was a good experience. I only wish I kept that boat and never upgraded to the fiberglass gods that followed. They were great boats but for my usage that 21 would have been fine. Had teak Spray rails, great yamaha 200, a slick t top and sweet graphics. I hope to find pics one day and post them here. If the 68' happens I will certainly be back looking for pointers. I hope it's intact enough to not have to undergo the full facelift but thats a lot of years to not anticipate something. Stay tuned!
Thanks all again!

Sktenor...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft