Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 10-11-2016, 07:48 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by otterhound View Post
I have an '89 20' SF and the keel on mine is straight as well. Haven't checked the upper panels but will do so tomorrow. The build quality on mine is good but definitely a bit lighter on the glass than the Potter builds that I have. The transom on mine is solid as well so it looks like Tracker did a decent job in this area. I did have soft spots in the floor at all the console and leaning post fasteners. They used balsa core in the floor, plywood squares in the hatches and access panel on mine. The plywood was rotted and water logged on mine. The Seacraft ride is still there though
Did yours also have the 70 gal tank which was 5 inches longer than the coffin deck opening?
The extra 20 gallons or 140 lbs of weight is forward which I suspect was to improve CG, balance, and ride.

The glass work on my 89 20 is also surprisingly good, but lighter than Potter builds.

Hull shape can also be adversely affected by age/rot and trailer set up.
Bunks which fall short of the transom or too few rollers can do the same thing.

Many BW foam sandwich hulls look like the moon because of this.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft