![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great job Ken. What is your take on planning speed and CG?
__________________
Snookerd |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't notice any change in planning speed but then again I was wasn't checking for a minimum. I did notice the change in CG though. Previously my sled was always bow heavy due to design, my weight and ice/gear load. This has changed considerably causing new sounds being made by the hull. I now hear the "squishing" sounds as my forward chines are now out of the water where they should be at low speeds.
The other new characteristic is how the boat "breaks free" when the bracket surface clears the water coming of the stern step. With the Hermco you literally have a stepped 26' hull and when the step clears you instantly notice it. My boat has never been this fast nor as fuel efficient at all cruise ranges. Also note I have gone from an 18 pitch to a 20" and still am in the operating range. All big improvements. The overall ride at the helm has improved as expected. I now have a bow in front of me and the removal of the dash pods and glove box have improved the view as well. As of now there is nothing I would have done different. The room in the back is just as ample when you consider the bracket platform and full transom.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose ! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like a complete upgrade in the areas you were hoping for. All the boxes got checked off !! Low-speed planning is the only thing that I want to maintain if/when the bracket scenario gets put on the table.
__________________
Snookerd |
![]() |
|
|