Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2019, 06:14 PM
Capt Terry Capt Terry is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybones View Post
Thanks Terry, thats good stuff. I'm still trying to absorb it a little to where I can see it in my head 3D at the moment its still a little clunky upstairs but it has all the basics needed to dial it in.

Do you know the set back of the Hermco bracket..26?

Does mounting height of bracket (within standard reason) have much if any affect on its value as a lever arm?

I imagine I am giving myself plenty of wiggle room with my 12"x12" trim tabs (provided I go ahead and set it up as close to COG as I reasonably can), but are there any other considerations I should should make because of the tabs?

Lastly, what if ... someone... were to also have a hydraulic jack-plate adding an additional 6"inch set back (taking that into consideration for the lever arm too), any thoughts on pros or cons or comments? (someone we all know recommended I do jackplate on bracket with a good argument but I really think he just wants to see someone do it for the sake of experimentation, while he sits back, has a smoke and watches Frankenstein build a monster..
Ryan=
Sorry for the delay, I was out of town.

I used 2' for the engine location on a Hermco, don't remember if this was a guess or from Bushwacker.

There is also a vertical component of cg, which I ignored. I would expect little effect of engine height on the longitudinal cg. However with the length of the bracket you may need to raise your engine higher than you expect to get the AV plate on top of the water. Check for other posts on this. Bushwacker added a mechanical jack plate to his, for this very reason.

You asked about the additional effects on your cg if your 175HP ETEC were mounted on a hydraulic jack plate in addition to a bracket. I returned to my CG Change Estimator posted on 9-24-16. I used the “original example” except changed the hull weight from 1800# to 1600# and 418# for the ETEC to get a baseline cg of 4.8’ fwd of the transom. (This may not be where yours is, but we are talking changes here, so read on). Then for using the ETEC on a 200# bracket with the engine 2’ further aft the estimated cg is 3.9’ fwd of the transom or about 11” further aft with the bracket (similar to the results Bushwacker experienced when he put his ETEC 150 on a Hermco bracket. Then I considered the engine 6” further aft on a 50# hydraulic jack plate attached to a bracket which put the cg at a minuscule 1” further aft then without the jack plate. I think you mentioned your boat guests are hefty, so they may even compensate for the bracket mounted engine. Move them around to judge the effects. Bob Reiland who may have made 50 Bahama crossings on his SeaCraft 21’ Unoho didn’t have trim tables; he just moved people or cargo around to adjust trim.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2019, 06:26 PM
Capt Terry Capt Terry is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt Terry View Post
Ryan=
I used 2' for the engine location on a Hermco, don't remember if this was a guess or from Bushwacker.
.

Sorry Ryan, the 2' mentioned above was to the cg of the bracket. My example calculations were that the engine cg moved from 0.5' aft of the transom to 3' aft when on a bracket. Better let one of the Hermco bracket owners chime in on this. My examples were intended to be illustrative of the cg technique, not absolutes.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2019, 02:38 PM
Rybones Rybones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 134
Default

Thanks for all the info Terry, I've been tied up and haven't done anything yet, but we'll see if any bracket owners chime in.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2019, 04:19 PM
jtharmo jtharmo is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 115
Default

On Bushwacker's old Seafari the bracket is 30" from transom to the back of the mounting plate measured along the swim platform. The manual jack plate is a touch less than 4". So the motor is moved way back behind the transom. Without trim tabs it can and will buck hard. By comparison, my yellow '78 with 175 Black Max on the transom was smooth with just engine trim.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2019, 08:29 PM
Rybones Rybones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 134
Default

I would be looking at 32" over all. What do you mean by "buck hard"?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2019, 09:58 PM
jtharmo jtharmo is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybones View Post
I would be looking at 32" over all. What do you mean by "buck hard"?
Porpoising if I use no trim tab at all. I don’t have a fine touch with trim so I’m sure I start with too much until on plane. Then I trim engine and tabs up for best speed. Don’t get me wrong, it’s more then manageable. I just can’t firewall-it without thinking like the old boat.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2019, 10:23 PM
Rybones Rybones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 134
Default

Gotcha, and that makes perfect sense.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft