Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2021, 05:54 PM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcnight View Post
Am I missing anything?
Yes. You're missing the test data from the other two props.

You want to look at a few things when you compare props: diameter, pitch, cup, blade width, rake, and rake curve or progression. Some props also use a progressive pitch ratio. They all make a difference.

One note: SeaCraft hulls ALL really like stern-lifting props. This is due in part to the VDH design which gives no flat perpendicular planing surface to provide that lift. More pitch close to the hub gives greater stern-lift. This is why a 4-blade prop of a given diameter and pitch has much greater stern-lift than a 3-blade. It moves a theoretically similar column of water the same distance, but the additional blade, area near the hub particularly, gives it more lift.

But just like flaps on a plane, the added lift also gives you 1/3 more functional drag at the blades.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft