Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-18-2022, 10:24 AM
wattaway2 wattaway2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft.Lauderdale,Fl.
Posts: 611
Default Bracket shape

Had an interesting conversation withe a buddy that just redid a 21 Mako about flat bottom vs V bottom brackets. My 23 has a flat bottom Stainless marine bracket and his is a custom V bracket. He noted that he gets a lot of water spray off his bracket where as my flat bottom has none any one else notice Any peculiarities in the two designs? Wonder if the flat bottom allows the motor to be raised higher vs the V type would have to recheck but I think I’m about 5 3/4” up from the keel.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2022, 08:16 PM
JohnC JohnC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 190
Default

I don't believe there is usually any bracket in the water when your on plane so my guess is that the hull features/angle of attack would be the driving factor there. Something that isn't touching the water should not be causing spray. Just my $0.02.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2022, 10:27 PM
wattaway2 wattaway2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft.Lauderdale,Fl.
Posts: 611
Default

Would agree in the most part as when he is on plane it is greatly reduced but still there until he is really flying 38 mph or higher before the transom wash clears the pod. Starting to wonder if the flat bottom is acting like a bit of a 2nd pad
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-21-2022, 07:46 PM
workinpr0gress workinpr0gress is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 601
Default

Do the corners of your bracket almost touch the trailing edge of the running surface of the hull?
__________________
Thank goodness that in the scheme of things you are broke, powerlesss and inconsequential, because with the shortsighted alternatives and idealogy you have you'd be much worse than those you complain about.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2022, 05:23 AM
wattaway2 wattaway2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft.Lauderdale,Fl.
Posts: 611
Default

Yes pretty much. I picked up a used double engine bracket for the extra flotation then got with Stainless marine about the install . They gave me measurements that allowed for some latitude in height. I installed at there lowest for max flotation . In hind site might have raised it 1”-1 1/2 as my motor is raised up as far as I can but works well and don’t think I’d raise it any higher. Interesting the top bolt spread from the two engines was only 1/16-1/8” off the width needed for the single so we slightly elongated them ,welded the other hole and redrilled for the bottom holes.Then had to cut access holes in the two plates in the bracket to reach the bolts— hardest damn aluminum I’ve ever cut ! Would have thought it was stainless steel!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-24-2022, 07:24 PM
Ed Ed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,014
Default

The v bottom brackets give slightly more buoyancy due to more displacement below water line. They should have no spray at all as the lowest point in the water is the keel. Only spray should be from trim tabs or transducer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-24-2022, 11:09 PM
strick strick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 2,738
Default

No spray should be coming off the bracket if mounted properly..as noted it should be out of the water when on plane...so either the bracket is mounted too low or the motor is too low and the spray is coming from the anti cavitation plate...my guess

strick
__________________
"I always wanted to piss in the Rhine" (General George Patton upon entering Germany)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-25-2022, 09:38 PM
wattaway2 wattaway2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft.Lauderdale,Fl.
Posts: 611
Default

Would tend to agree with your assessment Stric. He has it mounted really low - noe the chances of getting him to move it up………..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-26-2022, 09:56 AM
workinpr0gress workinpr0gress is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 601
Default

It could be mounted to low for the shape and width of the bracket because someone was trying get as much submerged volume out of the chamber as possible. In my mind the bracket chamber is the wrong shape for a twin engine bracket on that hull . The corner of the chamber should not meet the edge of the running surface. There shouldn’t be any spray when up on plane.
__________________
Thank goodness that in the scheme of things you are broke, powerlesss and inconsequential, because with the shortsighted alternatives and idealogy you have you'd be much worse than those you complain about.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:17 PM
Capt Chuck's Avatar
Capt Chuck Capt Chuck is offline
gucci
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sailfish Capital, fla
Posts: 2,804
Default

It appears via the picture that the bracket would cause extreme " Squatting" on a hole shot coupled with flat surface running plane. I had one of the original Potter Brackets I purchased personally from Bill . It's V bottom in alignment with the dead rise kept the stern in line with the running surface of the main hull See the pictures.
I would have too ride this hull to ensure performance
before purchase
Attached Images
  
__________________


1978 23' Superfish/Potter Bracket 250HP --------



as "Americans" you have the right to ......
"LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT of a Classic SeaCraft" -capt_chuck
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft