Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2002, 11:34 PM
My Sacrifice My Sacrifice is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: north carolina
Posts: 26
Default Re: 1973 23ft.seacraft

If I decided to go with twin outboards what brand or kind of floatation bracket would you think would be the best?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2002, 11:35 PM
My Sacrifice My Sacrifice is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: north carolina
Posts: 26
Default Re: 1973 23ft.seacraft

If I decided to go with twin outboards what brand or kind of floatation bracket would you think would be the best?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2002, 11:59 PM
Trayder Trayder is offline
Velvet Jones
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Newport RI / Key West FL
Posts: 1,642
Default Re: 1973 23ft.seacraft

I have spoken with just about all of them. Bill Potter is actually in the business now he makes an all glass one that is much lighter than all the rest. It is a bit expensive but not much more than comparable aluim models. Here is a link to them:

Seamark/Hermco

Other then them here are you other alternatives:

Armstrong
Gill
B-Bracket
seamount
<a href="http://www.dadmarine.com/index00.htm" target="_blank">Dad's
Marine</a>
Stainless Marine


I found Stainless, B-Bracket and Gill, tough to deal with. They did not want to bather with a small guy like me. I may have caught them on a bad day also.

Hermco was fantastic, he is actually a member of this site, seamount was also nice and priced well, I have yet to contact Dads but they seem very well priced and you can get them unfinished so if you are re painting your hull you will be able to get the bracket to match perfectly.

Keep us updated.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-05-2002, 12:07 AM
My Sacrifice My Sacrifice is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: north carolina
Posts: 26
Default Re: 1973 23ft.seacraft

The other thought on the bracket and outboards is what is a good safe maxium horsepower. I would like to get the most I could but, I do not want to take chances with the structual integrity of the hull.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2002, 07:19 AM
CaptMin CaptMin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: St. Augustine, Fl
Posts: 10
Default Re: 1973 23ft.seacraft

I'd leave the I/O in the boat. The gain in cockpit room is traded out in fishing space off the stern. The boat is designed and balanced for the I/O, and it's easier to work on if you are on the water and have a problem. It's cleaner and more economical. Motor parts can be purchased anywhere, and cheaper.
I have the original chev. straight 6 in my 1967 Seacraft. For the first 15 years, it hung in a sling at a camp year round, and was used 12 months out of the year. It ran at 2 speeds, wide open and stopped. It still has the same alternater on it. I replaced the head and valves on it once at probably 1/6 the cost of a power head on a large OB, and I recall replaceing a fuel pump while sitting comfortably on the deck next to the motor.
It's been on the trailer for the last bunch of years, but a neighbor changed the points, condenser, plugs, coil, and rigged a can for fresh gas, and it startd (about a year ago). No blue smoke, no black smoke, no nothing, and it ran and idled as good as ever.
There might be a safty factor also. I don't know what kind of water you use the boat in, but if you ever get caught in a bad storm or heavy seas, you might be glad that you didn't do anything to alter the balance, and sea worthiness of the
boat.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2002, 09:52 AM
JeffS JeffS is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cape Cod MA
Posts: 6
Default Re: 1973 23ft.seacraft

Forgive me oh great one. I do not have a Seacraft but do have a similar hull I am just about to start to gut and build back up into a center console. It is a 24ft Seabird Hardtop OMC I/O *blown motor and crappy outdrive* which I plan to bracket and put a 225 on. Looking at the bracket links I was unaware of *flotation versus non flotation* Is there a method or formula for deciding which type you will need? And what about the set back length? I have read threads about bracket height and this gets pretty detailed as well. Then there is the issue of 25 or 30" shaft motor...Oh man....This all gets scary at times...*GULP*...The seabird has a deck below waterline and obviously is not self bailing. I plan to change that and raise the deck nearly 8 -10" and make it self bailing tho. I will still have great freeboard and my knees will still be under the gunwale....This site is going to be my little home away from home now.. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]

[ March 05, 2002, 08:54 AM: Message edited by: JeffS ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2002, 11:06 AM
Billybob Billybob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: watertown ct.
Posts: 377
Default Re: 1973 23ft.seacraft

I already oferred my opinion on the I/O, and Capt Min's point on fishability is well taken, the engine boxes I've seen on Seacrafts are pretty unobtrusive as well.I don't quite understand why some of you want to go with a longer shaft on a bracket.Seems to me that raising a bracket higher to accomodate a longer shaft with the setback that a bracket provides may alter the attitude of the boat,especially at below planing speeds.I can see a longer shaft on a transom, but only to keep waves from coming over.I don't get it as it relates to a performance enhancement on a bracket.Is it common practice to run 30" bracketed o/b's on a 23'.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft