Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2010, 05:53 PM
Islandtrader Islandtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tarpon Capital Of The World
Posts: 2,122
Default I/O vs. OB

Just a general nonsense question

Same boat same horsepower.

Would they both go about the same speed or would one be that much faster (I don't know the answer)?

I guess this would be a good trivia question.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

"If You Done It...It Ain't Braggin"



my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=18594
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2010, 07:45 PM
McGillicuddy McGillicuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 32.77 N, 117.01 W
Posts: 2,184
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Good question...
I'm guessing the difference would be minimal. On the Moeslyseacraft.com site Carla had some Mercury tests for the Bowrider and the 20' but they were like 125 O/B vs 140 I/O and a 100 O/B vs a 120 I/O.

In each case the greater HP I/O had advantage ranging from 1 to 2.5 mph top end... I guess you could extrapolate from that or just gather some of your southland buddies and go get some answers for us
__________________
there's no such thing as normal anymore...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2010, 11:46 PM
htillman htillman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 517
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Above all look at weight to horsepower ratio. Then consider drag if that may make a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2010, 12:02 AM
workinpr0gress workinpr0gress is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 601
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

An outboard also puts weight further back, you usually get more boat out of the water trimmed out at higher speed with an outboard.
__________________
Thank goodness that in the scheme of things you are broke, powerlesss and inconsequential, because with the shortsighted alternatives and idealogy you have you'd be much worse than those you complain about.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2010, 02:03 AM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

I think Eddie's right, a DI 2-stroke OB will have the edge on power/wt, and with the weight a little farther back, would be able to get a little more hull out of the water, so I think it'd have a little more top speed. With the heavy 4-stroke OB's, there might not be that much difference. The CG would be a little further forward with the I/O however, so it might ride a little better, and actually be able to cruise faster in rough water! So there are trade offs as usual - I guess it comes down to how you want to use the boat!
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2010, 09:25 AM
ScottM ScottM is offline
Dieter Sprockets
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 2,221
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

My father's 23' Sceptre OB (225 Yam OX66 carb on 6" manual jack plate) is within 1mph WOT of his best friend's 23' Sceptre I/O (260 Merc carb/Alpha drive). Their cruise speeds are similar too. The one thing I like better about the I/O is ride - all that weight down low gives it a bigger boat feel under way. The OB has a virtual dance floor in the cockpit so it's better for fishing.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2010, 10:05 AM
oldfielder oldfielder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miller Place, NY
Posts: 269
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Since there are a lot of 23 cc's with o/b here, I can chime in and say that my i/o's top end has been around 41 mph burning about 20 gph. My optimal cruise is right around 27-28 mph, getting 2.8 mpg. This is with a mercruiser 250/carbed/alpha.
It does ride like a tank when i need it to. The funny thing about fishing space on this boat is that I fish most often with two guys and the engine compartment makes an excellent casting platform in the back.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-04-2010, 04:58 PM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

I have had a '72 20' Seafari with an inline 150 Mercury outboard (same motor was later re-rated as the Mercury 140, but rated at the prop)

I have also extensively used a '73 Seafari with a Mercruiser 3.0L 140 hp I/O.

The outboard accelerated faster, planing about 1 second faster. Optimum cruise speed on the OB was about 27-28 mph at about 9 gph. Top speed was about 40-41 mph. Fishing offshore while anchored in the OB had the problem of water coming in the engine well and then down into the bilge through the cable boot. On the other hand, the OB Seafari can comfortably fish 4 people.

The sterndrive (with a brand new '83 motor) had a slightly smoother ride in a chop, and cruised at 26 mph, getting much better fuel economy at only 6 1/2 gph, and had a slightly higher top end of 44 mph. Fishing while anchored in the sterndrive brought no water in due to the full transom, but was comfortable for 2, 3 or 4 was slightly crowded because of the engine box.

Does this answer the question?
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-05-2010, 09:39 AM
adamcannon adamcannon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Newport, North Carolina
Posts: 63
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

I like that an outboard has its own little compact compartment(no engine box in the floor). Probably the best thing about an outboard(and most of you have been here). You go out in the boat(I/O or OB) and the son-of-a-b@#$h breaks down and leaves you strainded. While the towboatus guy is dragging you back to the ramp you can have the OB unbolted(no cherry picker required) and making a nice little artificial reef that you can go back and fish later. With an I/O it is pretty easy to blow you and your boat into a million pieces if you were to forget to turn on the blower. The only thing I like about the I/O is the ride. They do ride much better in a chop.
__________________
1975 Seacraft 18SF w/2004 150hp Johnson 2-stroke on a 26" bracket
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-05-2010, 11:43 AM
BigLew BigLew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newburyport Area; Massachusetts
Posts: 1,364
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Quote:
While the towboatus guy is dragging you back to the ramp you can have the OB unbolted(no cherry picker required) and making a nice little artificial reef that you can go back and fish later. With an I/O it is pretty easy to blow you and your boat into a million pieces if you were to forget to turn on the blower.
????- What's that about, or am I missing something?
__________________
Getting home is more important than getting there!

Plan accordingly!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft