Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-11-2012, 02:29 PM
Tarpun Tarpun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 187
Default 3.0 or 4.3 mercruiser ?

I,ve been thinking about replacing my 1972 Seafari's original 3.0 pre-alpha engine and drive with a more current model. I have come across complete later model 4.3 with Alpha 2 drive. It's a more current 4.3 with balancer. My original plan was to stick with the 3.0 for good economy but since the avail. V6 has me thinking. I know it weighs more and will burn more fuel but it will be less stressed and allow a faster cruise. I was always under the impression the 3.0 was a good unit but a couple folks have said they have gasket and manifold problems and that 4.3 is better in that way, also that the 3.0 is too little power for the Seafari. I don't plan on taking divers and gear or generally using it with more than 2 or persons total. So how about some learned opinions from the forum. I would love to hear off hands on experience. I did a site search and did get a little info. How about it ? Thanks in advance. Dave
__________________
Tarpun
1972 20 Seafari
1977 23 Savage
1980 20'Master Angler

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-11-2012, 06:53 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Hey Dave,

My 4.3 in my `03 weenie mobile truck lost the intake gasket @ 59K. It was a known problem by GM and Texaco and their wonderful Dex Cool. I got a gasket set made by Fel Pro badged as the "problem solver". I had a tech tell me that he had seen freeze plugs fail because of Dex Cool. Little trucks and small scraped knuckles. How do big folks work on these?

The 4.3 is a good motor. A 350 minus 2 cyls. I`ve seen them turn 250k easily. The 3.0 is also seen on the road from the `90s. Tough call. My `03 is rated @ 240 ft lbs.

Cheers,
Sandy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-11-2012, 07:59 PM
db3155 db3155 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Merritt isl Fl.
Posts: 51
Default

3.0 Mercruiser is a commercial engine its never been in a car.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-11-2012, 08:29 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by db3155 View Post
3.0 Mercruiser is a commercial engine its never been in a car.
Of course a Mercruiser has never been in a car.... Maybe from Cuba? `59 Poncho? 53 Chev truck?

The thing is we marinizzze motahs. Get it?

It`s....it is........ its.....a pronoun.

Many 3.0`s are in my neighbor`s driveways...........

Ogden Nash where are you now?
GFS
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-11-2012, 08:43 PM
Blue_Heron Blue_Heron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gator Country
Posts: 1,416
Default

The 4.3 V6 will require different motor mounts than the 3.0, so the boat will need some modification to make it work. Just something to think about.

The current 3.0s are 140hp, the 4.3 MPI is 220hp. The 3.0 should be plenty for a 20, but a 4.3 will really make her scoot if that's what you want.

Dave
__________________
Blue Heron Boat Works
Reinventing the wheel, one spoke at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-11-2012, 08:53 PM
Entourage Entourage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fairhaven Mass
Posts: 583
Default

4.3 is a great motor. Look the Chevy astrovan and safari vans with the vortec they are great. I have twin 4.3mpi in my 29 footer with bravo 1s and wot is 33 knots.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-11-2012, 09:42 PM
Tarpun Tarpun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 187
Default

I'm quite famililar with the 4.3 , put alot of miles on one. Sandy, I had the same anti freeze issues with a couple of vehichles. bad product. I think the 4.3 is a very durable well made engine. (after all it's 3/4's of a small block Chev) Very reliable but never impressed me with it's fuel economy in a vehicle. I was wondering if it would be any better in a boat. Anybody have one in 20 Seacraft? What is your fuel burn?. I'm happy with 3.0 but lately I've heard a bunch of negatives about corrosion problems, manifold leakage. lack of durabilty pushing a 20' boat. I'd always heard good things.Just got me thinkin'. A good deal on a clean package adds to the thought process.
Entourage, whats your cruise and fuel burn at cruise?
__________________
Tarpun
1972 20 Seafari
1977 23 Savage
1980 20'Master Angler

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-12-2012, 11:33 AM
Entourage Entourage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fairhaven Mass
Posts: 583
Default

I cruise at 24 kts at 3800 rpms wot 4700 rpm 33 kts and do a 60 mile round trip with a charter of six with fish and burn about 30-35 gallons of fuel. Using mercury inertia 15 pitch stainless props. My friend has a older carburated 4.3 with the 4bbl carb and his fuel consumption isn't as good especially when he gets on it. I have a 20 ft safari and I was going to put a 4.3 in it just never did it. I know the engine compartment may be tight cause I did do some measuring.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft