Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-21-2018, 10:44 AM
WIDGEON WIDGEON is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 3
Default Stringer Foam

I'm in the process of removing the foam from the stringers in my 20 SF. Most was pretty wet. My question is: what weight foam should I replace this with and do I need to replace the foam outside of the stringers. Stringers may not be the correct description. Should be box framework below deck perhaps.
Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-21-2018, 05:29 PM
Mshugg Mshugg is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 19
Default

Some will likely tell you that the foam isn’t structural, but if you want to match original spec, use 4lb foam.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-23-2018, 05:44 PM
Capt Terry Capt Terry is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 573
Default Wet foam, why?

Wondering why there are so many reports of wet foam. I know there are differing opinions on foam around aluminum tanks. When I replaced mine RDS told me to use “closed cell” foam. Was that not used during original manufacturing years ago or does the closed cell foam break down? As I recall there was no saturation of the original foam around my tank.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-23-2018, 07:09 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

I believe that my @ 70 gallon tank on my 1979 MA, new to me in 1996, was a second tank, due to the elevated tank fill. Whatever type of foam was not correct. The cell gave up the ghost on bottom and sides, were eaten through aluminum wherever in contact with foam. New tank being installed now. No foam and coal tar epoxied. Aluminum fuel tanks have become somewhat expensive.

Vezo Part I! 1987 18 SF, new fuel tank, installed in 2009, has become corroded with stuff while storing/buying non ethanol fuel, and only on the Inside! Fuel/Water Separator doing its job on a 2009 Suzuki 140 and runs like a Champ on above deck 12 gallon remote fuel tank.?.

Vezo, Part II
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2018, 08:23 AM
cdavisdb cdavisdb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,056
Default

Closed cell pour foam isn't always very "closed". At least some of the stuff that comes as slabs of closed cell really is. I've experimented with both as buoyancy adjusters for my monofin and the closed cell pour stuff I've used gets soaked pretty fast.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2018, 09:49 AM
rcoster38 rcoster38 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 40
Default

I just pulled my deck off to find that each of my stringer tops had a series of 1" holes cut into them, exposing the foam. It looked like the putty was intended to cover the holes but I think they missed their mark on a couple holes and the foam underneath was soaked.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2018, 10:31 AM
uncleboo uncleboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edenton, NC
Posts: 1,583
Default

In my humble opinion, I don't think they worried with closing all the holes up in the stringers. If there is enough water in the bilge to cover the tops of the stringers, you might be riding home in another vessel, (orange & white maybe).
__________________
1975 SF18/ 2002 DF140
1972 15' MonArk/ 1972 Merc 50
http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/z...photos/SC3.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2018, 11:55 AM
DonV DonV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Apollo Beach or Islamorada
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via ICQ to DonV
Default

Boo is correct, since the top of the stringers are only about 1" below the deck's surface you would be in deep poo-poo!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-03-2019, 05:23 PM
rcoster38 rcoster38 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 40
Default

all I know is there seems to be more water than foam in my stringers. after replacing it with dry 2lb foam, swapping the soggy wood deck with divinycell, and ripping out the waterlogged bilge foam, and doing away with the t-top, she might be terrifyingly fast
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2019, 08:56 AM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

I think a lot of project boat spent too much time in the back yard before they are sold and fill up with water. I've seen it a bunch of times and most people think nothing of it as they have no intention doing the rebuild.

I for one am not a big foam fan but I don't think all the rehab of foam done is that necessary. If the foam got wet, it can get un-wet if drain and vent holes are made and the hull is kept open and dry for sufficient time. Once it is all dry, glass the holes and move on with the build.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft