Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old 10-11-2015, 10:09 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnafuFishTeam View Post
When I bought the boat I thought with only a 200 it would be a dog. Far from it. . . .
That's a common misconception, thanks to the inefficiency of modern hulls designed with a wide beam to support the weight of heavy 4-stroke motors and the high deadrise needed to get a decent ride with the wide beam!

Nowadays the average guy thinks even a 20 is underpowered if it doesn't have at least 200 hp, because they don't have a clue about how efficient the SeaCraft VDH bottom design is! When I tell 'em that a SeaCraft 20 works just fine with a LIGHT 100-130 hp motor, they think I'm nuts! Moesly proved that the VDH was 10% faster than conventional Ray Hunt-type deep-V hulls with the same weight and HP way back in the 60's at Mercury's Lake X! It had an unbeatable combination of soft ride and efficiency 50 years ago, and I'm frankly amazed that nobody has come up with anything better in all that time!
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft